10:23 AM

Don’t let insurance agencies pull this trick on you.


Man driving convertible in countryside

By Krystal Steinmetz


Meet “Sally” and “Suzy”: These 30-year-old twin sisters are identical in nearly every way. Both women live in Louisville, Kentucky. They’re both employed full time, have stellar driving records, decent credit ratings and no lapses in car insurance coverage. They even drive twin 2005 Honda Civics – same color, make, model and mileage.


Sally pays $2,408 a year for car insurance – to get a policy providing theminimum coverage required by Kentucky – through Farmers Insurance. Meanwhile, Suzy pays Farmers $1,640 for the exact same coverage. So why is Sally paying 47 percent more than Suzy for the same insurance?


According to the Consumer Federation of America, Sally is forced to pony up more cash for insurance because she’s arenter and Suzy is a homeowner.


From our Solutions Center: How to quickly shop insurance


That’s right. The CFA – which recently conducted an analysis of premium quotes from the major auto insurers for a 30-year-old safe driver in 10 cities across the United States – found that consumers pay an average of 7 percent more (about $112 a year) for auto insurance if they write a rent check rather than a mortgage check for their home.


Depending on the insurer and where drivers live, they could be like Sally — paying upwards of 47 percent more for insurance. For example, Allstate’s auto insurance quote for a renter in Tampa, Florida, was 19 percent more than a homeowner. In Baltimore, Liberty Mutual charged renters 23 percent more.


The CFA maintains that auto insurance companies’ use of homeownership status in pricing leaves low- and moderate-income Americans at an unfair disadvantage. According to Federal Reserve Board data, the median income of renters in the United States was $27,800 in 2013, compared with $63,400 for homeowners.


“To raise people’s auto insurance premium because they can’t afford to buy their homes unfairly discriminates against lower-income drivers,” said CFA Insurance Director J. Robert Hunter in a prepared statement. “A good driver is a good driver whether she rents or owns her home. Insurance companies should not be allowed to target people based on homeownership status.”


The CFA obtained quotes from State Farm, Geico, Allstate, Progressive, Farmers, Liberty Mutual and Nationwide. Geico was the only insurer whose quotes were the same, regardless of the driver’s homeownership status.


“Virtually every state requires drivers to buy insurance, but we shouldn’t force them to buy a home in order to get the best price,” Hunter said. “State insurance commissioners and elected representatives should step in and stop this practice,” he added.



One Weird (and Infuriating) Reason You May Pay More for Car Insurance

10:04 AM

All drivers are legally required to have car insurance, but many people resent what can be a hefty annual expense. The good news, however, is that you can keep costs to a minimum by avoiding some of the most common motor cover traps


Trap 1: Thinking that loyalty pays


Many drivers assume that, if they stick with the same insurer year after year, they’ll be rewarded for their loyalty with lower premiums. On the contrary. Insurers thrive on our apathy and can bump up premiums each year, even when no claim has been made.


The best quotes are usually given to new customers, so the chances are you’ll be offered a more competitive deal if you shop around for cover every year. And even if your existing insurer offers you a lower price than last year, you could probably still save by comparing what else is on offer. So the message is simple: DON’T AUTO-RENEW YOUR CAR INSURANCE!


Trap 2: Buying third party, fire & theft to save money


You might think that, if you buy the minimum level of cover, the premiums will be much lower. But that’s not the case – often you can get comprehensive cover for a similar or even lower price than third party fire & theft cover. And comprehensive car insurance will provide you with much greater protection. Again, shop around.


Trap 3: Paying by monthly instalments


Although paying for your insurance cover upfront can seem more painful financially, it is actually much more cost-effective than spreading the cost by with monthly payments. Insurers usually add steep interest charges to instalments which can dramatically increase the overall cost, so if you can afford to pay the full premium at the outset, you should do so.



One option is to pay your premium in one go using a 0% purchase credit card, where you don’t pay any interest on your spending for up to 18 months. You should aim to clear the debt within 12 months though, so you’re only paying one insurance bill at any one time. It will also mean you avoid a hefty interest rate on the card balance whenever the interest-free period comes to an end.


Trap 4: Assuming all policies are the same


They’re not! Always read the small-print of your car insurance policy as cover can vary widely. Make sure the policy you choose suits your requirements. For example, does yours offer a courtesy car in the event your car needs repairs or is stolen? If not, and you don’t have another vehicle or sources of transport available, you could find yourself stuck. Same applies to breakdown cover.


Trap 5: Ignoring the excess


If a particular motor insurance policy seems unbelievably cheap, always check the excess, which is the portion of any insurance claim you must pay yourself. A very high excess can mean much lower premiums, but also that you might struggle to afford to make a claim at all, which defeats the point of having insurance in the first place.


The excess has two parts – the mandatory and the voluntary elements. The former is set by the insurer, you control the latter.


Trap 6: Overlooking telematics


Younger motorists generally have to pay higher car insurance costs than older drivers, but they may be able to reduce the cost of cover with a telematics policy. Here, ‘black box’ technology monitors the driver’s behaviour and habits and rewards safe and responsible driving with cheaper premiums. But be warned, if you aren’t confident your driving skills are up to scratch, then you’re unlikely to see a reduction in costs. And many telematics policies impose limits of 5,000 or 6,000 miles per annum, rendering them impractical for many drivers.


Trap 7: Not insuring your car because you never drive it


It is a legal offence to keep a vehicle without insurance unless you have notified DVLA that your vehicle is being kept off the road by means of a Statutory Off Road Notice (SORN). You don’t have to be driving to be caught. Even if it never leaves the garage, you either need insurance or you need to file a SORN.


Penalties for transgressing this law include a fixed penalty of £100, your vehicle being clamped, seized and disposed of, and a court prosecution with a maximum fine of £1,000.


Trap 8: Trying to save money by putting a parent as the main driver


Falsely declaring another person is the main driver of the vehicle when they aren’t is illegal. It is known as ‘fronting’ and can not only invalidate your insurance but can lead to a fine and penalty points on your licence, so it should be avoided at all costs. However, you can add a more experienced person as a named driver on your policy to help reduce premiums.


This tactic works for pretty much any driver because the insurer assumes the risk of an accident or theft will be reduced if more than one driver has access to the vehicle.


Trap 9: Making unafforable modifications


Tempting as it may be to fit alloy wheels or the latest stereo system in your car, making modifications can have a major impact on your insurance premiums – simply because the vehicle is no longer its original spec. Speak to your insurer if you are planning on making any changes to find out whether it will bump up the cost of cover.


Trap 10: Assuming all policies cover European driving


Millions of people take their cars abroad each year, but not all insurers include European cover in their policies, which could leave you high and dry if you have an accident while you’re abroad. Check the small print of your policy before leaving British shores and, if in doubt, check with your provider. If your policy doesn’t include European cover, you may be able to add it in return for an extra premium.



10 car insurance traps

7:26 AM

Finding yourself with an empty nest can be a shock to the system – once the children have left the house, there are many changes to take on board.


Watching the pennies


Most of us can only dream of running a top marque such as a Porsche, and economy will be a common priority. In fact, many will welcome the opportunity to ditch the hefty running costs associated with a people-carrier or estate in favour of a less fuel-thirsty vehicle.


The Hyundai i20 Hatchback puts fuel efficiency to the fore, squeezing 870 miles out of a tank of diesel in its Blue Drive iteration. And the car is yours for a relatively modest £8,700, or thereabouts.


When it comes to insurance, our couple in their fifties, living in London, would pay around £235 for insurance if they agreed to a £350 excess.


Giving green a go


When you’re nurturing your family, your motoring priorities tend to be having enough room for, first of all, car seats and buggies, and then a few years down the line for the lanky teenagers the babies grow into. Anxieties about environmentally-friendly motoring can often take a back seat (as it were), regardless of our best intentions.


But once the family has flown the nest, you can bring green concerns further up the agenda. If you’re not ready to take the plunge with a fully-electric car, an attractive stepping stone could by the Toyota Yaris Hybrid, which combines an electric motor with a conventional petrol engine.


At £15,495, the Yaris Hybrid is not cheap – it’s essentially just a snazzy hatchback, after all. But it’s exempt from road duty thanks to its CO2 emissions of 79g/km, and you should get around 80 miles per gallon.


Insuring a 3-door version, our couple in their living in a rural location in North Wales would pay a few pounds over £300 with a £310 excess.


Finessing a 4×4


Empty-nesting does not necessarily mean retrenchment to a modest runabout. If your taste favours a hefty 4×4, there are loads of cars out there to suit a broad range of budget and performance preferences.


The Subaru New Forester 2.0DX might be worth investigating if you’ve got £25,000 to play with. It’s not a monster along the lines of offerings from BMW, Porsche or Range Rover, but it’s powerful and easy on the eye. It’ll certainly do the job if you want to sling your golf clubs in the back or take the dogs for an outing in the country.


As far as insurance is concerned, a couple in their fifties with an Edinburgh postcode would pay in the region of £350 with a £300 excess.


Towing a caravan


Time to choose a new car


And that includes the car parked outside – your choice of motor is now no longer restricted by chauffeuring your offspring around (Taxi of Mum & Dad, anyone?) and lugging the family shop back from the supermarket.


With that in mind, here’s a look at five cars that might be more suited to your empty-nester lifestyle than a blubber-boat people carrier.


Living the dream!


If money is no object, you can ditch the family-friendly runabout and upgrade to a luxury marque. Imagine – driving could become a pleasure once more, not an ordeal of arguments about which music to play and whose turn it is to scoop up the detritus from the footwell.


How about a Porsche 911 Carrera Cabriolet convertible? This little beauty will certainly turn heads, but you’ll need a hefty bank balance to get it on the road – this year’s model rocks in on the wrong side of £80,000.


You might assume you’d have to fork out another small fortune for car insurance, but the lowest premiums we found aren’t really that scary, all things considered. A couple in their fifties living in, say, the Cotswolds (with clean licences, full no claims discount and off-road parking) would pay just over £575 for fully comp cover if they carried a £500 excess



According to the Caravan Club, people in their fifties are the UK’s most enthusiastic caravanners – the average age of its members is 55.


Just as important as the caravan itself is the car that will be pulling it, and you might consider an estate to give you the necessary horsepower. The Volkswagen Passat Estate Alltrack is a possibility – it goes beyond mere estate territory towards the muscle and ruggedness of a fully-fledged SUV.


With a towing capacity of 2000kg you should be fine to tow your van, and it’s comforting to know you can still expect impressive fuel economy of around 50mpg.


You’ll need deep pockets for this vehicle, though, with a forecourt price a shade under £30,000. But as a car with a relatively safe risk profile, the insurance should be reasonable. For our couple in their fifties, this time living out-of-town in Cambridgeshire, we found premiums under £200 – although the excess is quite steep at £400. A lower excess would nudge up your annual cost.



Kids left home? It’s time to choose a new car

5:31 AM

If your children have reached the age when they’ve started driving, you’ll know only too well how expensive car insurance for young motorists can be. And, as a parent, your instinct will be to do what you can to help.


Fronting for your child


A motorist between the ages of 17 and 22 can expect to pay upwards of £1,000 for comprehensive cover, more than double the average price. And some pay much more than that, simply because of the claims figures which show young people are involved in a disproportionately high number of accidents.


But the end result is that many young people simply cannot afford such high premiums. And this has given rise to a practice known as fronting, where a more experienced driver who is not the main driver of a car takes out insurance and adds the youngster onto the policy.


This can save money but it can cause big strife for all concerned. Here’s why…


What is fronting?


Fronting occurs when an older, more experienced driver falsely insures a vehicle in their own name, even though the main driver is a younger, riskier motorist.


Let’s say your son or daughter is heading off to university and is taking the family runabout. A policy in their name is pricey, so you decide to put yourself forward as the main driver, adding your child as an additional named driver. The premium is now more reasonable, so everyone is happy. Or are they?


Fronting is often well meaning and can lead to lower premiums. But the practice is also illegal and could end up costing you dear. And it doesn’t matter if the fronting is deliberate or not. If you are caught out, you could be in big trouble.


Make a claim


The issue usually comes to light if you make a claim on your policy. For example, if your child is involved in an accident, the insurance company would no doubt investigate. It could then discover that your son or daughter is in fact the main driver of the vehicle, even though he or she is named only as an additional driver.


Its suspicions might be aroused if, say, the accident took place in your child’s university city, miles away from your home.


Insurers take a dim view of fronting and can come down hard on both you and your child. The company could, for example, refuse to pay for any damage to your car. If there was anyone else involved in the accident, the firm would be legally obliged to pay out any claim successfully brought by a third party, but it could then pursue you to recover the costs.


Harsh penalties


The insurer could also cancel the policy, leaving the young driver without insurance – and the penalties for driving without insurance can be harsh. An uninsured driver can expect a fine, points on their licence and even a driving ban. They will also pay more for car insurance in the future as previous convictions lead to higher premiums.


In addition, insurers bump up the cost of cover if insurance has ever been refused or cancelled. So, you could be hit with a double whammy.


Criminal record


That’s not all. Fronting is a type of insurance fraud, which means it’s a criminal offence. If you are prosecuted for fraud, you could therefore end up with a criminal record. Of course, no one wants to be branded a criminal, not least because criminals don’t usually find it easy to arrange insurance at any price. They also have difficulty accessing other financial products, including mortgages and credit cards.


Main driver


Fronting, however well intentioned, is clearly a bad idea with serious consequences. But how do you know if you are guilty of fronting? It’s not always clear who is the main driver, especially if several people use the vehicle.


But you should always be down as the main driver if you regularly drive the car to and from work or university, if you drive the car every day, or if you are responsible for the maintenance of the car. The insurance company should ask pertinent questions on your application form. Staff are also trained to look out for potential fronting types. But if you are in any doubt, ask. It can save a whole lot of time, trouble and cash further down the line.


Save money


Talking of saving money, there are other ways to cut the cost of insurance cover for young drivers. Parents can, for example, add themselves as a ‘named’ driver to a child’s policy. This will lower the cost of cover because the insurer will work on the basis that a more experienced driver is behind the wheel for at least part of the time.


Or, you could consider telematics insurance. This is where a GPS-enabled tracker is fitted to the vehicle, allowing the insurer to monitor when, where and how it is driven. The system sounds a bit sinister but can often bring down the cost of cover, especially if the driver demonstrates sensible driving skills and agrees to avoid driving at riskier times




Why ‘fronting’ for your child could cost you dear

5:16 AM

Car and home insurance premiums are at a four-year low, according to new MoneySuperMarket research, which means your next renewal could be cheaper than last time


Insurance premiums at 4-year low


But it’s still as important as ever to shop around for the best price every year!


Even if your current insurer has trimmed a few pounds off your premium, there could be bigger savings to be had elsewhere – with no need to compromise the quality of protection you enjoy.


That’s because insurers tend to reserve their best prices for new customers as they battle for share of the market. And the simple act of shopping around for our car insurance and home insurance makes you a new customer every time.


What’s happening to prices?



According to 49 million quotes run on MoneySuperMarket between April 2010 and March this year, the average car insurance premium is now £390. When prices peaked in the second quarter of 2011, the average premium was £545, which means there’s been a huge drop of 28%.


Home insurance premiums also sit at a four-year low, averaging at £126 – their lowest since MoneySuperMarket’s analysis began in 2010.


Here’s a look at why prices are falling, and why it’s just as important as it’s ever been to make sure you’re getting the absolute best price on your cover.


Maximise your savings


Clare Francis, editor-in-chief at MoneySuperMarket, said: “It’s the first time since we began monitoring market pricing in 2010 that we’ve seen both car and home insurance premiums fall this steeply across the country. This is great news for households struggling with the high cost of living and could help ease some of the pressure on the purse strings.


“Competition among providers is continuing to drive down the cost of car and home insurance policies and it’s important that consumers take advantage of this. Sticking with your existing insurer is unlikely to net you the best deal.


“Even though your renewal quote might be cheaper than the price you paid last year, chances are you will be able to save even more by switching to a different insurer so it is really important to shop around if you want to maximise the savings available to you.


“Finding the best deal on car and home insurance is quick and easy to do, and consumers stand to pocket up to £220 and £70 respectively* using MoneySuperMarket.”


North of the border


Our analysis has revealed stark regional differences for motorists.


For example, drivers in Carlisle have seen the most benefit, compared to this time last year, as their premiums have fallen by 15%. Motorists in Truro and Galashiels were almost equally fortunate, as their average premiums fell by 14%, year on year.


Car insurance buyers in Perth and Galashiels have the cheapest premiums overall, with annual cover typically costing £231 and £232 respectively.


In fact, Scotland fared well overall, as six of the top 10 cheapest locations for cover are north of the English border.



Cheaper home cover


The entire country benefitted from cheaper home insurance premiums, as costs fell across all 121 postal regions over the past 12 months – according to analysis of more than 11.8 million home insurance quotes run between March 2010 and February this year.


Home insurance premiums fell by 21%, nationally, while Bolton recorded the steepest drop in average premiums, falling by 19% (£26) over 12 months. Hull and Crewe also did well, benefitting to price drops of 14%.


The average cost of combined buildings and contents cover fell by 19% between 2011 and February this year to £142.


Don’t be wooed


As Clare Francis explains, just because your car or home renewal quotes might be lower this year than last year – it doesn’t mean they’ll be the absolute cheapest prices available to you.


Don’t be wooed by slightly lower prices from your current insurer – instead, take 10 minutes to compare prices using our car insurance and home insurance comparison services, and cut your insurance bills even furthe




Insurance premiums at 4-year low

5:08 AM

MPs are demanding a crackdown on fraudulent whiplash claims to achieve further reductions in car insurance premiums.




MPs target fraud to cut car insurance costs


According to MoneySuperMarket’s latest analysis of 42.5 million quotations run on the site between January 2011 and June 2014, average car insurance costs have plummeted by almost £100 in the period, from £505 to £406. They recorded a £5 fall from May to June 2014, reversing a brief upward trend that started in February 2014.


People who switch insurer at renewal, rather than those who automatically stick with the same firm, are usually in line for the biggest savings, making it important to shop around at renewal time.


Members of the Parliamentary Transport Select Committee say there would be scope for further reductions if claims costs could be squeezed further. They cite invented and exaggerated whiplash injuries, inducements paid by solicitors to encourage claims, and insurer willingness to settle claims without medical or legal challenge as areas needing urgent attention.


They also want a funding boost for the police Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department, improved sharing of data relating to fraud, and the creation of independent medical panels to determine the likelihood of whiplash injury, which is almost impossible to prove or disprove from a purely medical perspective.


Insurance in the spotlight


Motor insurance and premium prices are now very much a part of the political agenda, having been the subject of Parliamentary debate, a prime ministerial summit and the catalyst for legislative changes, as well as reports from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission.


A recent government report on the ‘dysfunctional’ car insurance market pointed out that whiplash claims add around £90 to the cost of every car insurance premium. According to the Association of British Insurers, fraud is setting the industry back about £2 billion a year. It is estimated that this is adding £50 to the price of every insurance policy.


Possible solutions


Among suggestions as to how the problem could be tackled are independent assessment of claimants and a ban on referral fees paid by solicitors.


So will this latest report offer up any new ideas that can be put into practice to bring car insurance costs down even further?


Weeding out false whiplash claims


Although insurers continue to work hard to weed out fraudulent claims, the cost of motor-related personal injury claims is still on the rise, even as the number of crashes on UK roads continue to fall.


The Transport Committee report therefore puts particular emphasis on aspects of the market that have ‘encouraged criminality to take root’ – namely those fraudulent or exaggerated whiplash claims.


To clampdown on the number of fraudulent claims the select committee recommends insurers should be stopped from settling whiplash claims before the claimant has undergone a thorough examination from a genuinely independent medical professional.


Under the current set up, solicitors can commission medical reports on whiplash and other soft tissue injuries from medical experts who could have a vested interest in a positive diagnosis. It’s hoped that setting up independent medical panels will reduce or eliminate false or exaggerated claims and put off any opportunistic claimants who may not fancy trying to convince a panel of their supposed injuries.


The Transport Committee also calling for a ban on solicitors offering incentives, such as up-front cash payments or laptop computers, to encourage motorists to claim after an accident.


It is also deeply suspicious of the growing trend of solicitors seeking medical reports into psychological trauma after even minor collisions – something which suggests that unscrupulous firms are looking for new areas in which to generate illicit revenues.


Spurious claims


Kevin Pratt, insurance expert at MoneySuperMarket, said: “At present, it’s more cost effective for an insurer to pay out a small personal injury claim, no matter how spurious, than try and prove the injury has been exaggerated or even made up completely, primarily because soft-tissue injuries are difficult to prove one way or another.


“The formation of independent medical panels will go some way to addressing the problem. It should be coupled with a system that sees claims for treatment paid directly to physiotherapists or medical staff in settlement of their bills, and not the claimants themselves.”






MPs target fraud to cut car insurance costs

5:01 AM

Pressure from consumer groups and the financial regulator has prompted the Association of British of Insurers (ABI) to commit to making car and home insurance renewal notices clearer and more consistent.


Clearer insurance policy renewals on the way?


The ABI has written to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) proposing an initiative which would force insurers to include in renewal notices how much a customer paid for cover the previous year, therefore showing clearly how the renewal quote compares.


It also wants to include mention of first-year discounts, effectively warning policyholders that the price will be higher at renewal.


The ABI wants the changes to be in place by the end of 2015.


‘Long overdue’


MoneySuperMarket car insurance expert Natasha Glasgow has backed the proposals, but thinks they could be taken further.


Natasha said: “At long last, the insurance industry is waking up to the fact that it has made the process of renewing policies at a competitive price as difficult as possible, with many customers paying way over the odds because they stick with the same insurer year after year.


“Greater transparency is long overdue and we welcome the ABI’s proposals which have resulted from greater scrutiny by the regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority.”


Could go further


But forcing insurers to tell customers how much they paid last year does not go far enough, says Natasha: “Seeing last year’s price on a renewal quote is one step towards getting a good deal – but far from a silver bullet. Car insurance premiums are falling for new customers – as first year deals offer discounts to entice customers in – so comparing across the market will reveal how good a deal your renewal price really is.


“We would like to see these measures go further, and tackle the issue of insurers automatically renewing policies for the second year.


“This practice hinders customer’s abilities to shop around for the best deal. We also hear of some people ending up with two policies running simultaneously, or a policy that no longer offers them the right level of cover.


“Insurers at the very least need to make it much clearer whether customers will have their insurance automatically renewed unless they actively opt out.”


Proof problems


As we found from more than 80 reader comments on our blog Get proof of your no claims discount, proof of no claims is another area which could be clearer.


For example, Don Hanney wrote: “I’ve long been peeved by this insurance-company scam, having lost many years NCD through various companies recognising limited years of claim-free policies. Surely there should be an industry standard.”


Natasha agrees that changes are needed. She said: “Proof of a customer’s No Claims Discount should also be given in the renewal documents. Not having this kind of information readily available can create a real barrier to customers wanting to move to a different insurer because some providers make it very difficult to obtain.”




Clearer insurance policy renewals on the way?
Powered by Blogger.
Hide
X